Legal Opinion

Berg v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1906No. 6158PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Hatch, J., entered December 22, 1905, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff for personal injuries sustained by a motorman in a collision on a street railway.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, C. J.

Action for personal injuries. Plaintiff recovered a judgment for $5,000. Defendant appeals.

The appellant operated a line of electric street railway between Seattle and Renton, a distance of twelve miles. The line consisted of a single track, with numerous switches and sidetracks or turnouts. There were but two through cars between Seattle and Renton. There were four or five local cars running between Seattle and Rainier Beach, which was a station some eight miles out of Seattle. The respondent was employed as a motorman on one of the through cars. These two through cars were called express…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. DriscollIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Howe v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Stevick v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Northern Pacific Railroad v. O'BrienWashington Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Conine v. Olympia Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. MathewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Hale v. Crown Columbia Pulp & Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Frengen v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Hage v. LuedinghausWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Craig v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API