Legal Opinion

Westerlund v. Rothschild

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1909No. 7862PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Talhnan, J., entered July 1, 1908, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

Appellants are stevedores and employed respondent, with several others, in loading a vessel with piling. The pile was lifted by a cable with attached hooks, and placed in the hold of the ship, where it was respondent’s work to place it in proper position and, when so placed, to detach the hooks. When the hooks were released and plaintiff had assumed a position of safety, a signal would be given by one *627called a side-runner, to a signalman, who in turn signaled to the engineer in charge of the engine, which was outside of the ship and on a scow, neither it nor the engineer being within sight or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dossett v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. O'Brien v. Page Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. McDonough v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Sroufe v. Moran Bros. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Conine v. Olympia Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Buss v. WachsmithWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Cole v. GerrickWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Frengen v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. King v. Page Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Larson v. Alaska Steamship Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API