Legal Opinion

Purdie v. Brunswick

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1944No. 29224PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steinert, J. —

This action grew out of a collision between two automobiles traveling in opposite directions along a city street. Plaintiff, the owner of one of the vehicles, brought suit to recover damages for the injuries and loss sustained by him in the accident. Defendants cross-complained for damages done to the automobile owned by them. The cause was tried to the court without a jury. The trial court found that the collision and resulting damages were caused solely by the negligence'of the defendant driver. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendants appealed.

The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Burlie v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Hartley v. LasaterWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Eubanks v. MullisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Segerstrom v. LawrenceWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Kelly v. Schmidt & Zeigler, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Frei v. BrownleeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  2. American Smelting & Refining Co. v. WusichArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Wentz v. T. E. Connolly, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Lee & Eastes, Inc. v. Continental Carriers, Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Anderson v. KurrellWashington Supreme Court · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API