Legal Opinion

Runquist v. Koeppel

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided February 14, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*570OPINION OF THE COURT

Mark H. Spires, J.

Petitioners move for a judgment awarding possession of penthouse B at 250 East 73rd Street pursuant to RPAPL 713 (10) and for treble damages pursuant to RPAPL 853. Respondent cross-moves for a judgment dismissing this action.

Petitioners’ verified petition alleges the following facts. Petitioner Schwartz, the proposed subtenant of the prime tenant petitioner Runquist, was denied subtenancy by the respondents by letter dated December 12, 1989. On January 6, 1990 petitioner Runquist departed for Sweden where he was temporarily relocated. By that date…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conrad v. Third Sutton Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Lowman v. SpragueNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Fish v. SimpsonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984
  4. Miller v. Bleecker Charles Co.New York Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Almonte v. City of New York (HPD)Civil Court of the City of New York · 1993
  2. Paulino v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API