Legal Opinion
Conrad v. Third Sutton Realty Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 2, 1981PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROSS, J.
On this appeal we are asked to consider the respective rights of a landlord and a tenant, where the former unreasonably withholds consent to sublet the apartment of the tenant. The defendant landlord maintains that his rights include releasing the tenant from the existing obligations under the lease or the tenant can forego the sublease and continue in occupancy. The plaintiff tenant argues that her rights are not so circumscribed. Plaintiff asserts *51that she has the option, under these circumstances, to ob-a release or to sublet the apartment to the proposed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Eichner v. DillonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Lexann Realty Co. v. DeitchmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1980
3Cited by41 opinions
- Lexann Realty Co. v. DeitchmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Vance v. Century Apartments AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Kreitman v. EinyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Reisler v. 60 Gramercy Park North Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Bragar v. Berkeley Associates Co.New York Supreme Court · 1981
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.