Vanguard Insurance v. Hartford Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHWEITZER, J.
JAppeal by plaintiff Vanguard Insurance Company from judgment in favor of defendant Hartford Insurance Company in an action for declaratory relief in which plaintiff sought to recover from defendant a pro rata share of a settlement made by plaintiff of a damage claim. The essential facts are not in dispute.
Hartford insured a Mr. and Mrs. Anderson under a “homeowners” policy which contained the following insuring clauses: “To pay on behalf of the insured all sums which the insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages because of bodily injury or property damage,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Whittell v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bullock v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- People v. DeayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Otter v. General Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Freudenberger v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1996
- Otanez v. Blue Skies Mobile Home ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.