Legal Opinion
Chavis v. Struebel
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided March 29, 2004No. 1:00-cr-00097PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
SCHROEDER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties have consented to the assignment of this case to the undersigned to conduct all proceedings in this case, including the entry of final judgment. Dkt.# 21.
Plaintiff commenced this action pro se, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that numerous defendants denied him his rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Dkt. # 1. Plaintiffs complaint was dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(b) and 1915A by Order of the Court entered…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Allah v. PooleDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
- Chavis v. ZodlowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Shine v. HofmanDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2008