Legal Opinion
Shine v. Hofman
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided March 7, 2008No. 2:06 CV 237PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILLIAM K. SESSIONS III, Chief Judge.
The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed January 25, 2008. Plaintiffs objections were filed February 4, 2008 and Defendants’ objections were filed on February 14, 2008.
A district judge must make a de novo determination of those portions of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation to which an objection is made. Fed. R.Civ.P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Perez-Rubio v. Wyckoff, 718 F.Supp. 217, 227 (S.D.N.Y.1989). The district judge may “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the magistrate’s proposed…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Coleman v. BealeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- Ford v. AramarkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Gamble v. GarciaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020