Legal Opinion

Goff-Hamel v. Obstetricians & Gynecologists, P.C.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1999No. S-97-1007PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

NATURE OF CASE

Julie Goff-Hamel brought this action against Obstetricians & Gynecologists, P.C. (Obstetricians), seeking damages for breach of an alleged oral employment contract or, in the alternative, damages for detrimental reliance on a promise of employment. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Obstetricians, and Goff-Hamel appeals.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

In reviewing a summary judgment, an appellate court views the evidence in a light most favorable to the party against whom the judgment is granted and gives such party the benefit of all reasonable inferences deducible from the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Eby v. York-Division, Borg-WarnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Grouse v. Group Health Plan, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Karon L. Comeaux Sherrika Marzette Comeaux v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Hoiengs v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Merrick v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Clark v. Kellogg Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  2. Blinn v. Beatrice Community Hospital & Health Center, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. May v. Harris Management Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Parker v. Lancaster County School District No. 001Nebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Burns v. NielsenNebraska Supreme Court · 2007

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API