Legal Opinion

In re Daubner

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 24, 1899No. 85PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Bankruptcy. On review of rulings of referee in bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

BILLINGER, District Judge.

The bankrupt claims a homestead of 160 acres of laud, with growing crops, as exempt under the state homestead law, excepting as to two claims in favor of the First National Dank of Pendleton, — one of which is evidenced by a note dated November 1, 1892, and the other by a note dated April 27, 3893, — the state homestead law not having gone into effect until after the making of the latter note; and this much is conceded by the trustee. But it is claimed further for the bankrupt that the homestead is exempt as to these debts of the bank under the homestead law of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re CoffmanDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1899

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Davis' EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Olmsted-Stevenson Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
  3. Buroker v. RaybournDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
  4. In re HoagDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1899
  5. Anderson v. Dayton Plumbing Supply Co. (In Re Anderson)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API