Olmsted-Stevenson Co. v. Miller
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Petition for Revision of Proceedings of the District Court of the United States for the District of Montana; George M. Bourquin, Judge. In the matter of R. S. Miller, bankrupt. An order of the referee, requiring the bankrupt to file a supplemental schedule, was reversed by the District Court (221 Fed. 690), and the Olmsted-Stevenson Company files a petition to revise.
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, District Judge.
On the Sth day of February, 1914, the respondent, Miller, filed his voluntary petition in bankruptcy in the court below, accompanied by the usual schedules of his debts, assets, and property. At the time of filing the petition the bankrupt was in possession of a homestead held by him under the laws of the United States, upon which final proof had not been made. A crop of wheat growing on this homestead was not included in the schedules filed. An order of adjudication followed the filing of the voluntary petition, and this in turn was followed by an order of discharge…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In re RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1899
- Alexander v. HoltTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Morgan v. RountreeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- In re RoadarmourCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- Moore & Rollow v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Schulte-UnitedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Brainard v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
- WM. R. Moore Dry Goods Co. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
- Doyle v. PonsfordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Gadd v. DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.