Legal Opinion

In re Coffman

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided April 12, 1899No. 9PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Bankruptcy. On review of decision of referee.

1Opinion of the Court

MEEK, District Judge.

The bankrupt, B. F. Coffman, complains of the action of the referee in sustaining the motion of the trustee, asking that the bankrupt be compelled to turn over to the trustee, or account for, the proceeds of the sale of three bales of cotton. The cotton composing the three bales was, at the time Coffman was adjudicated a bankrupt, growing on his homestead. Subsequent to the appointment and qualification of the trustee, it was gathered and taken from said homestead. The bankrupt claims said cotton as exempt to him under the laws of Texas. The exemption laws of the state of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Coates v. CaldwellTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Silberberg v. TrillingTexas Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Olmsted-Stevenson Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
  2. In re DaubnerDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1899
  3. In re HoagDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1899
  4. In re MillerDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1915
  5. Olmsted-Stevenson Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API