Milwaukee County v. Schmidt, Garden & Erikson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
This appeal turns on the answer to a single question: On March 18, 1959, six years prior to the commencement of this action, had the statute of limitations started to run on such action against the plaintiff?
The trial court correctly saw this as the lone issue in this controversy and in holding that sec. 893.19 (5), Stats., rather than sec. 893.19 (3), applied in this matter, the trial court necessarily concluded that the cause of action was not in contract but in tort. Since either subsection invokes a six-year statute of limitation, the crucial inquiry must be as to from which event the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bank of Hartford County v. WatermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
- McCluskey v. ThranowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Pietsch v. MilbrathWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Klingbeil v. SaucermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
- Reistad v. ManzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- The Gates Rubber Company, a Corporation v. Usm Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Cease Electric Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Segall v. HurwitzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
- Tamminen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- CLL Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Arrowhead Pacific Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.