Expando Production Company v. Marshall
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANGDON, Justice.
This case involves construction of a pooling clause contained in certain oil and gas leases. The pivotal question is whether such pooling clause permitted the enlargement of a producing unit several years after it was initially formed and long after the primary term of such leases had expired. The trial court held that the attempt to enlarge the unit was not authorized by the pooling provision of the leases and declared same to be null and void. Judgment was accordingly entered for the appellees. The pipeline purchaser (a defendant in the trial court) was directed to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones v. KillingsworthTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Phillips Petroleum Company v. Heber A. Peterson and Astrid N. D. Peterson, Phillips Petroleum Company v. John H. Haslem and Rebecca H. HaslemCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Tiller v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Peterson v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Texaco, Inc. v. LettermannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. First Baptist Church of PyoteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Elliott v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Samson Lone Star, Ltd. Partnership v. HooksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- MCZ, INC. v. Triolo, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
- McCarter v. RansomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.