Legal Opinion

Oneida County v. Converse

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 17, 1992No. 92-1483PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.

The Converses appeal a summary judgment granted to Oneida County and argue that the local zoning ordinance Oneida County seeks to enforce is invalid. We conclude that the relevant portion of the county zoning ordinance is inconsistent with state law and is therefore invalid.

A tornado destroyed the Converses' boathouse on Tomahawk Lake in Oneida County. Seeking to rebuild the boathouse, the Converses were advised that the state did not require a permit to rebuild a boathouse damaged by violent winds. The Converses, however, did need to apply for a permit from Oneida County under the County…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ball v. District No. 4, Area BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Law Enforcement Standards Board v. Village of Lyndon StationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Wisconsin Ass'n of Food Dealers v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State Ex Rel. Staples v. Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oneida County v. ConverseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Opinion No. Oag 9-93, (1993), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API