Legal Opinion
Oneida County v. Converse
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided December 8, 1993No. 92-1483PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEFFERNAN, CHIEF JUSTICE.
This is a review of a decision of the court of appeals, Oneida County v. Converse, 173 Wis. 2d 78, 496 N.W.2d 124 (Ct. App. 1992), reversing a judgment entered pursuant to an order of the Oneida County Circuit Court, James P. Jansen, Judge, dated May 16, 1992, which granted summary judgment to Oneida County and ordered R. Bruce Converse et al. to pay forfeitures and remove a boathouse erected in violation of the Oneida County Zoning and Shorelands Protection Ordinances.
The issue we address on this review is whether the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) exceeded…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Village of Plain v. HarderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Basic Products Corp. v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Peterson v. Natural Resources BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Oneida County v. ConverseCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
3Cited by20 opinions
- Adams v. State Livestock Facilities Siting Review BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Clean Wisconsin, Inc. v. DNRWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
- Chvala v. BubolzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- Mallo v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Rusk County Citizen Action Group, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.