Legal Opinion
Pass v. McGrath Attorney General of United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 7, 1952No. 10682_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant sued under § 9(a) of the Trading with the Enemy Act, as amended, 42 Stat. 1511, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 9(a), to recover property vested in the Custodian, pursuant to § 5(b) of the Act, as belonging to a national and resident of Germany. The complaint alleges that appellant is a native-born citizen of the United States; that he owns the property; that in 1943, when the Custodian took it, he was unavoidably living in Germany; that he returned to the United States in August, 1946 and filed a notice of claim with the Custodian in September, 1946. The complaint was filed in October,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. MichelSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Maricopa County v. Valley Nat. Bank of PhoenixSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
3Cited by9 opinions
- Price v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- District of Columbia v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATIONDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Helmut Legerlotz v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian v. Morizo NakashimaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Cisatlantic Corp. v. BrownellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.