Legal Opinion
Maricopa County v. Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 1, 1943No. 449PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
Petitioners are counties of the state of Arizona and certain county officers. Respondent is a national banking association incorporated under the laws of the United States and having its principal banking house at Phoenix, Maricopa County, Arizona. It sued petitioners 1 to restrain the collection of certain state, county, school dis trict and municipal taxes for the years 1935 and 1936 and invoked the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona under § 24 (1) (a) of the Judicial Code, 28 U. S. C. § 41 (1) (a).
Respondent has two classes of shares of capital…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Dodge v. Board of Ed. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Frisbie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Ex Parte BransfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Beaver CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Alfred Morris v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Aaron Henry v. First National Bank of Clarksdale v. Mississippi Action for Progress, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Patchak v. ZinkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.