Helmut Legerlotz v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge.
This is an alien property case, in which the central issue is whether plaintiff-appellant is barred by the statute of limitations.
On September 29, 1943, the Alien Property Custodian seized property belonging to the appellant. 8 Fed.Reg. 13271. Formal claim for the return of the property, satisfying the requirements of both Sections 9(a) and 32 of the Trading With the Enemy Act, 1 was filed on December 16, 1946. 2 On December 22, 1948, the Attorney General published a notice of intention to return appellant’s property, pursuant to Section 32(f) and the appropriate…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Argonaut Navigation Co. v. KotsifakisSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Wallace v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- McGrath v. ZanderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Andreae v. RedfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Pass v. McGrath Attorney General of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Madeline Bosely v. City of EuclidCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Lark v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Kondo v. KatzenbachCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Bevelheimer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- AMP INCORPORATED v. GardnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.