Legal Opinion

Cisatlantic Corp. v. Brownell

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 1, 1953PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLANCY, District Judge.

By order dated July 2, 1942, supplemented by an order dated April 27, 1943, the Alien Property Custodian vested a forge plant in which plaintiffs claim an interest. On September 15, 1942 plaintiffs filed a claim with the Custodian for return of the forge plant pursuant to § 9(a) of the Trading With the Enemy Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 9(a). This claim was hea.rd by the Vested Property Claims Committee which rendered a decision on June 10, 1944 disallowing the claim. On February 17, 1947 plaintiffs filed a mo*407'tion for rehearing which:was''granted by order of the Vested…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pass v. McGrath Attorney General of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kondo v. KatzenbachCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  2. Xenia Grabbe and Olga Gaydebouroff v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, as Successor to the Alien Property CustodianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  3. Masae Kondo v. Nicholas Deb. Katzenbach, Attorney General of the United States, Masaru Okamoto v. Nicholas Deb. Katzenbach, Attorney General of the United States, Ayako Honda v. Nicholas Deb. Katzenbach, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  4. Cisatlantic Corporation v. BrownellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API