Legal Opinion
Fresh International Corp. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 9, 1986No. 84-6351PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
The Agricultural Labor Relations Board of the State of California (ALRB or the Board) appeals from the district court’s summary judgment order, holding that California’s Agricultural Labor Relations Act, Cal.Lab.Code §§ 1140-1166.3 (West Supp. 1986), is preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461 (1982) (ERISA), to the extent that it may be applied in a way that affects employee benefit plans. We hold that the district court should have abstained from hearing this action on the merits under the doctrine of Younger v. Harris,…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fresh International Corp. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Korean Buddhist Dae Won Sa Temple v. City and County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1996
- Jonathan Club v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1988
- Rodrigues v. County of HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1993
- Batiza v. SuperfonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.