Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Arnold

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1937No. Appeal, 48PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

James, J.,

On September 1, 1934 appellant filed a libel in divorce from bed and board alleging cruel and barbarous treatment and indignities to the person. The master was of the opinion that the charge of cruel and barbarous treatment had not been sustained, but recommended a decree on the ground of indignities and awarded alimony of twenty-five dollars per month. Exceptions to the master’s report were sustained by the court of common pleas and the libel dismissed.

By section II, paragraph (d) of the Act of May 2,1929, P. L. 1237, a divorce from bed and board may be obtained by the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mathias v. MathiasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Dailey v. DaileySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Conrad v. ConradSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Altwater v. AltwaterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Kett v. KettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Politylo v. PolityloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Jones v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Craig v. CraigSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Hastings v. HastingsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Nesbert v. NesbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API