Craig v. Craig
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Gunther, J.,
Frances R. Craig, appellee, instituted this action in divorce a mensa et thoro charging indignities to the person. The cause was heard by the court below and a decree granting the divorce entered. There is merit to the husband’s contention that the evidence is wholly insufficient to warrant a decree of divorce; the decree will be reversed.
The proof required in an action a mensa et thoro must be as clearly established as in an action for absolute divorce. Arnold v. Arnold, 128 Pa. Superior Ct. 423, 424, 194 A. 229; Jones v. Jones, 144 Pa. Superior Ct. 372, 19 A. 2d 480.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Esenwein v. EsenweinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Breene v. BreeneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Mathias v. MathiasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Monaco v. MonacoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Jones v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth ex rel. Reddick v. ReddickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Com. Ex Rel. Reddick v. ReddickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Reddick v. ReddickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- McGuigan v. McGuiganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.