Legal Opinion

Craig v. Craig

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 17, 1952No. Appeal, 97PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

Frances R. Craig, appellee, instituted this action in divorce a mensa et thoro charging indignities to the person. The cause was heard by the court below and a decree granting the divorce entered. There is merit to the husband’s contention that the evidence is wholly insufficient to warrant a decree of divorce; the decree will be reversed.

The proof required in an action a mensa et thoro must be as clearly established as in an action for absolute divorce. Arnold v. Arnold, 128 Pa. Superior Ct. 423, 424, 194 A. 229; Jones v. Jones, 144 Pa. Superior Ct. 372, 19 A. 2d 480.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Esenwein v. EsenweinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Breene v. BreeneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Mathias v. MathiasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Monaco v. MonacoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Jones v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Reddick v. ReddickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Com. Ex Rel. Reddick v. ReddickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Reddick v. ReddickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. McGuigan v. McGuiganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API