Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Conrad

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 1933No. Appeal 66PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

Upon a review of the record in this divorce case for the purpose of reaching an independent judgment as required (Langeland v. Langeland, 108 Pa. Superior Ct. 375, 164 A. 816) in the absence of a, jury trial, we are not persuaded that the decree awarding a divorce to the husband should be affirmed.

The libel was filed May 6, 1931, under the Divorce Law of May 2, 1929, P. L. 1237, and manifestly was intended to charge that respondent had: (1) by cruel and barbarous treatment endangered the life of libel-lant; and (2) offered such indignities to his person as to render…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Esenwein v. EsenweinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Langeland v. LangelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Edmond's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  4. Bishop v. BishopSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  5. Esenwein v. EsenweinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sleight v. SleightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Huston v. HustonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Duchossois v. DuchossoisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Mentser v. MentserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Bobst v. BobstSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API