Legal Opinion

Hundley v. Matthews Hinsman Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 8, 1964No. 50267PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGER, Chief Justice.

This case came here by certification of the Kansas City Court of Appeals for a “reexamination of the applicable law,” although that court reversed the judgment of the Circuit Court. That opinion appears at 368 S.W.2d 528. The case involves a Workmen’s Compensation claim and the question here is solely one of limitations. The referee and the Industrial Commission denied compensation and the Circuit Court affirmed.

The facts appear in detail in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, but we digest here those necessary to an understanding of the issue. Rozanne Hundley, an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pillsbury v. United Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Wheeler v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Kobilkin v. PillsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  4. Ford v. American Brake Shoe Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Hayes v. Detroit Steel Casting Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Welborn v. Southern Equipment CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. Enyard v. Consolidated UnderwritersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Williams v. SN Long Warehouse CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Welborn v. Southern Equipment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API