Legal Opinion

Meylink v. Minnehaha Cooperative Oil Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1940No. File No. 8299PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Trial of this case resulted in a verdict for plaintiff which was set aside by the learned trial court upon motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Upon appeal this court directed the reinstatement of that verdict. 66 S. D. 351, 283 N. W. 161. After judgment was en tered, defendant made a motion for a new trial based upon specifications of insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. The present appeal is from the order denying a new trial.

The contention now made is that we should review the evidence as a whole under the rule of Drew v. Lawrence, 37 S. D. 620, 159 N. W. 274,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Drew v. LawrenceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Wolff v. StengerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Mundon v. GreenameyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Sioux National Bank v. LundbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Commercial & Savings Bank v. DuitsmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Eixenberger v. Belle Fourche Livestock ExchangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Hullander v. McIntyreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Sweetman Construction Co. v. Dakota Pump, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Graham v. Arall, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Gordinier v. Continental Assurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API