Legal Opinion

Drew v. Lawrence

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1916No. File No. 3832PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hyde County, Hon. Ai,va E. TayloR, Judge. Action by L. S. Drew, against H. E. Lawrence, to recover the value of .personalty sold 'by defendant, as sheriff, under execution.

1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, J.

Defendant, as sheriff, levied a writ of attachment upon, and afterwards sold under execution, certain horses and farm machinery. This property was levied upon and sold as the property of one W. Ringsdorf. Plaintiff, claiming to be the owner thereof, brought this action to recover the value of said property. Verdict and judgment being for defendant, plaintiff has appealed from the judgment and from an order refusing a new trial.

[1,2] The only assignment we find it necessary to consider is the one assigning the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. Before passing to a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Offutt v. World's Columbian ExpositionIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Mt. Adams & E. P. Inclined Ry. Co. v. LoweryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  3. Bartelott v. International BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Jeansch v. LewisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Serles v. SerlesOregon Supreme Court · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Osterkamp v. Alkota Manufacturing, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Biegler v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. LDL Cattle Co., Inc. v. GuetterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Lewis Ex Rel. Lewis v. StormsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BechardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API