Legal Opinion

Commercial & Savings Bank v. Duitsman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1925No. File No. 5500PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

This action was brought on two promissory notes, aggregating about $17,000, executed and delivered by defendant, appellant here, to plaintiff, respondent here. The answer admits the execution and delivery of the notes, but denies they were given for a valuable consideration, and alleges that each of said notes was executed and delivered without any consideration, and at the request of plaintiff, solely as an accommodation note. At the close of the trial, a verdict was directed for plaintiff. Later a new tidal was denied, and defendant has appealed from the judgment and order denying a new…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Drew v. LawrenceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Peet v. Dakota Fire & Marine Ins.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. HouckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Wolff v. StengerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Lohr v. WatsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  4. McCormick v. Rapid City National BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Sioux National Bank v. LundbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API