Legal Opinion

Markey v. Marino

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 28, 1987No. 1370PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

These consolidated appeals are from orders directing Allen Feingold, Esquire, to pay fines and counsel fees incurred because of “his conduct in stonewalling discovery proceedings without any reasonable basis and for deliberately ignoring court orders.” We will consider seriatim the issues raised.

Frank Markey, by his attorney, Allen Feingold, commenced an action against Dr. Joseph Marino for medical malpractice. On December 17, 1981, defense counsel caused a set of interrogatories to be served on the plaintiff. Later, on January 5, 1982, defense counsel also caused to be served a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Knaus v. KnausSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Magaziner v. MagazinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Gonzales v. Procaccio Bros. Trucking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Altemose Construction Co. v. Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kerns v. Methodist HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Steel v. WeisbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Fox v. GablerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. West v. AndersenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Convery v. Williams, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API