Legal Opinion

Steel v. Weisberg

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1987No. 00106PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

This case involves a question of whether certain information is protected from discovery by the Peer Review Protection Act. 1 The trial court found that the information sought is not protected by the Act, and issued a contempt order for appellant's refusal to produce the information at deposition. We affirm.

In March 1983, the plaintiff-appellee, Marc Steel, D.D.S., commenced this defamation action against Steven L. Weisberg, D.D.S. During the course of discovery, plaintiff Steel obtained a copy of a letter written by Weisberg to appellant, Dr. Charles R. Weber, in Weber’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. State College Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Knaus v. KnausSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farmers v. Commonwealth, Bureau of Employment Security Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Tyler v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Sanderson v. Frank S. Bryan, M.D., Ltd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sonder v. SonderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Genovese v. GenoveseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Cooper v. Delaware Valley Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Hayes v. Mercy Health Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Marshall v. PlanzDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API