Legal Opinion

Convery v. Williams

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County

Decided April 4, 1995No. 90-8382Published

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, J.,

This case arises out of the plaintiffs’ purchase of a residence which ultimately was discovered to have extensive termite damage.

Of the numerous named defendants, only defendant Eastern Termite and Pest Control Inc., remained at time of trial. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of defendant, having found negligence on the part of defendant and contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiffs, which was a substantial factor in bringing about their harm, thus barring recovery. Post-trial motions were *98timely filed and subsequently denied, and plaintiffs have appealed, thus…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. PruittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Markey v. MarinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API