Dietz v. Meyer
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
79 N.J. Super. 194 (1963)
191 A.2d 182
DANIEL V. DIETZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT MEYER AND CONSTANCE MEYER, DEFENDANTS, AND NED J. PARSEKIAN, DIRECTOR OF MOTOR VEHICLES OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 6, 1963.
Decided May 16, 1963.
Before Judges CONFORD, GAULKIN and KILKENNY.
Mr. Sam Weiss argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Brass & Brass, attorneys; Mr. Weiss, of counsel).
Mr. Jos. P. Dallanegra, Jr. argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Jos. P. Dallanegra, attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Douglas v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Giles v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Dixon v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Corrigan v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Tinsman v. ParsekianNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Clarke v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Feliciano v. OglesbyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Schaefer v. StreleckiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- Gargiulo v. Rutgers Casualty InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993