Legal Opinion

Dietz v. Meyer

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 16, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

79 N.J. Super. 194 (1963)

191 A.2d 182

DANIEL V. DIETZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

ROBERT MEYER AND CONSTANCE MEYER, DEFENDANTS, AND NED J. PARSEKIAN, DIRECTOR OF MOTOR VEHICLES OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 6, 1963.

Decided May 16, 1963.

Before Judges CONFORD, GAULKIN and KILKENNY.

Mr. Sam Weiss argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Brass & Brass, attorneys; Mr. Weiss, of counsel).

Mr. Jos. P. Dallanegra, Jr. argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Jos. P. Dallanegra, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Douglas v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Giles v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  3. Dixon v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. Corrigan v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  5. Tinsman v. ParsekianNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clarke v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  2. Feliciano v. OglesbyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  3. Schaefer v. StreleckiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  4. Gargiulo v. Rutgers Casualty InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API