Legal Opinion

Farwell v. Laird

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 10, 1897No. 9570PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Sedgwick district court. Hon. C. Reed, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Doster, G. J.

This was a suit for malicious prosecution, brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error. Only one question needs to be specially noticed. On the trial of the case the court, over defendant’s objections, received in evidence the find*403ing made by the justice of the peace that the complaint of the prosecuting witness against the accused was malicious and without probable cause, and instructed the jury as follows : ‘‘ Now in this connection, the court instructs the jury that if you find it to be a fact that the said R. R. Laird was arrested as aforesaid, upon a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. PerneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  2. In re EbenhackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Martin v. CorscaddenMontana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Groda v. American Stores CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Polk v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  4. Laird v. FarwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  5. Kness v. KommesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API