Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. Perney

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1888PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Wabaunsee District Comity. Action to recover damages for malicious prosecution. Trial at the June term, 1886, and judgment for the defeud-ant Perney. The plaintiff Sweeney brings the case to this court. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SimpsoN, C.:

This action was brought by Michael Sweeney against Joseph Perney, to recover damages for malicious prosecution. On the trial the jury found for the defendant; the plaintiff moved for a new trial; the motion was overruled; judgment was rendered against plaintiff, and he brings the case here for review. The record shows that Joseph Perney, as a road overseer, on the 1st day of July, *1031885, made complaint in writing under oath before a justice of the peace, charging Michael Sweeney with, on the 15th day of April, 1885, stealing, taking and carrying away some stones, of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Israel v. BrooksIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Williams v. VanmeterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1844
  3. Ricord v. Central Pacific RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Straus v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  5. Stanton v. HartMichigan Supreme Court · 1873

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ross v. HixonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  2. Sarwark Motor Sales, Inc. v. WoolridgeArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Murphy v. RussellArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. HollidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Pulliam v. OttMississippi Supreme Court · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API