Legal Opinion

Kness v. Kommes

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

De Graff, J.-

— Damages in this case are predicated on malicious prosecution. With the essential elements of the tort this appeal is not vitally concerned. Two propositions are relied upon by appellant for a reversal: (1) That the court erred in the admission.of .evidence showing that costs were .taxed to the prosecuting witness (appellant) in the criminal proceeding entitled State v. Dewey Kness; (2) that the verdict is’excessive. Of these in their order:

I. It appears that, during the examination of the justice of the peace as a witness on the instant trial, that magistrate was permitted to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Vinal v. CoreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Whipple v. Cumberland Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1843
  3. Martin v. CorscaddenMontana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. William M. Ross & Co. v. InnisIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  5. National Surety Co. v. MabrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1903

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Amos v. Prom, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1953
  2. Manders v. DallamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  3. Ceretti Ex Rel. Ceretti v. Des Moines Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API