Kness v. Kommes
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
De Graff, J.-
— Damages in this case are predicated on malicious prosecution. With the essential elements of the tort this appeal is not vitally concerned. Two propositions are relied upon by appellant for a reversal: (1) That the court erred in the admission.of .evidence showing that costs were .taxed to the prosecuting witness (appellant) in the criminal proceeding entitled State v. Dewey Kness; (2) that the verdict is’excessive. Of these in their order:
I. It appears that, during the examination of the justice of the peace as a witness on the instant trial, that magistrate was permitted to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Vinal v. CoreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
- Whipple v. Cumberland Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1843
- Martin v. CorscaddenMontana Supreme Court · 1906
- William M. Ross & Co. v. InnisIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
- National Surety Co. v. MabrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Amos v. Prom, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1953
- Manders v. DallamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Ceretti Ex Rel. Ceretti v. Des Moines Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1940