Laird v. Farwell
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Sedgwick district court; D. M. Dale, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J. :
This was an action by Richard R. Laird to recover damages from the defendants below, John V. Farwell & Co., for malicious prosecution. The firm of W. J. Wilson & Co. became indebted to the defendants in error in the sum of $30,000 and over, and to the State National Bank in about the sum of $7000, and to secure the same executed to them chattel mortgages on a stock of dry-goods, notions, fixtures, etc., in the city of Wichita. John V. Farwell & Co. were wholesale merchants in Chicago, and they, together with the bank, placed the possession…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mali v. . LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Carter v. Howe Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
- Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co. v. BoyceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Hudson v. M. K. & T. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Wright v. BachellerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Crelly v. Missouri & Kansas Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen v. State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Kastrup v. Yellow Cab & Baggage Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- Lewis v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
- Zamora v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.