Legal Opinion

United States v. Juan Antonio Contreras

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 23, 1991No. 91-2021PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

Juan Antonio Contreras contends that there is insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction for conspiring and attempting to kill Patricia Orozco in order to prevent her from testifying against him. He also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence with regard to his use of a weapon during and in relation to two crimes of violence and argues that the district court committed plain error when it instructed the jury as to attempt. Finally, he contends that Orozco was not an “inhabitant” of the United States within the meaning of the applicable civil rights…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. United States v. Donald Wesley Taylor, United States of America v. Steven Wayne Pressler, and Donald Wesley TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Roy MandujanoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. Ramon Jorge Laguardia and Marina Hidalgo GatoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. United States v. Todd Tykarsky A/K/A Toddyty63 A/K/A Golpher12345Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Pedro L. Castillo and Frank RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  4. State v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. United States v. FarnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API