Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Hooker Chemical & Plastics Corp.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 1, 1977PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TODD, Judge.

The defendants, Hooker Chemical & Plastics Corp. and Alfred Ingram, have been allowed and have perfected an interlocutory appeal from an order of the Trial Judge which overruled their motion for summary judgment and dismissal.

Plaintiffs have sued for the wrongful death of Donald Ray Carpenter, an employee of Maury Steel, Inc., whose death was allegedly the result of injuries received on the industrial premises of the defendant Hooker while under the supervision of the defendant Ingram, an employee of Hooker.

Defendants insist that plaintiff should not prevail in this common…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dedman v. DedmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Latham v. Technar, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1974
  3. Clendening v. London Assurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Provident Washington Insurance Company v. ReeseTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Gaston v. SharpeTennessee Supreme Court · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Mid-South Terminals Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  2. Stratton v. United Inter-Mountain Telephone Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Joan Stephens v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016
  4. Milford Wendell Posey, Jr. v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  5. Santos v. Standard Havens, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API