Legal Opinion
Wehrly v. American Motors Sales Corp.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided February 12, 1988No. Civ. F 86-248PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILLIAM C. LEE, District Judge.
American Motors Sales Corporation has filed a motion for summary judgment. The motion is fully briefed and ripe for a ruling. For the following reasons, the motion for summary judgment will be granted.
I
Summary Judgment Standards
Summary judgment is proper “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ. P. 56(c). Rule 56(c) mandates the entry of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. ClineSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Darnell v. Campbell County Fiscal CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1990
- Michael R. Hamilton, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Caterpillar Incorporated, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Haimovitz v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Berry v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.