Legal Opinion
Berry v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided June 17, 1992No. Civ. A. 88-2570-LPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
In this employment discrimination action, fifteen plaintiffs have sued General Motors Corporation (GM) alleging various theories of recovery, including race discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 et seq., and under 42 U.S.C. § 1981; sex discrimination under Title VII; age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 623 and 626(c); and breach of an implied contract of employment. 1 Defendant GM has moved for summary judgment on the implied contract…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Berry v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Daneshvar v. Graphic Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- Hartig v. Safelite Glass Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Aquilino v. University of KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Reese v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.