Legal Opinion
Haimovitz v. United States Department of Justice
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 23, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-0634PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
D. BROOKS SMITH, District Judge.
This matter is before us for disposition following a non-jury trial which commenced on August 7, 1989. In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52, we enter the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff, Ned Haimovitz, who is now sixty-five years of age, was employed as a General Attorney — Naturalization for the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) of the Department of Justice, and was stationed in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, a sub-office of the INS’ Philadelphia District. (Testimony of Haimovitz).
2. Haimovitz was employed by the INS from…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lehman v. NakshianSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Anthony J. Chipollini v. Spencer Gifts, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. Appeal of Anthony J. ChipolliniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- James R. WHITE, Appellant, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Brown, Regina C. v. Brody, Kenneth D.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Randlett v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Wilcoxon v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Darnell v. Campbell County Fiscal CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1990
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. MCI International, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.