Legal Opinion

Maffucci v. Royal Park Ltd. Partnership

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 13, 1996No. 14586PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.

In this negligence action, the plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the defendants’1 motion for summary judgment. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly concluded that no genuine issue of material fact existed as to (1) whether the defendants had actual or constructive notice as to the presence of trespassers, and (2) whether posted signs adequately warned the public as to the danger that existed on the property. We conclude that genuine issues of material fact did exist and therefore reverse the judgment of the trial court.

The pleadings,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Fogarty v. RashawSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Michaud v. GurneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  4. Spencer v. Good Earth Restaurant CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. State v. BretonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Maffucci v. Royal Park Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Maffucci v. Royal Park Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Beverage v. Every, No. Cv 96 0070898 (Nov. 12, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
  4. Dittman v. Spotten, No. 541013 (Apr. 27, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
  5. Doe v. Buongirno, No. Cv-00-0124271-S (Jul. 30, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API