Legal Opinion

Terry v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 1977No. Civ. 16109PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRIEDMAN, Acting P. J.

This is a breach of contract action emanating from the nationwide gasoline shortage of 1973. Defendant Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) had agreed to supply all the gasoline “requirements” of plaintiffs, who operated a service station. In May 1973 requests from the federal government impelled ARCO to allocate gasoline supplies among its dealers. Plaintiffs were dissatisfied with their allocation and filed this lawsuit that same month. They sought an injunction plus general and punitive damages. Meanwhile the allocation program was proceeding. Plaintiffs’ motion…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Corwin v. Los Angeles Newspaper Service Bureau, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Joslin v. Marin Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. R. D. Reeder Lathing Co. v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Milton v. Hudson Sales Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Exxon Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. James West v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Blackwell v. Phelps Dodge Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
  5. Reid v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API