Wojciuk v. United States Rubber Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The brief of the respondent plaintiffs contains an excellent summary of the facts which present the issues for present decision, as follows:
“Plaintiffs, husband and wife, have brought suit for personal injuries and related damages incurred when their automobile overturned due to an allegedly defective tire purchased by them some two weeks previously. They have sued the owner and operator of the Phillips “66” filling station from whom the tire was purchased (Fferbert Stuewer, d/b/a Fferb’s Service) ; the Phillips Petroleum Company whose name and trade-mark appeared on the tire and in prominent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Holland Furnace Co. v. NauracajIndiana Court of Appeals · 1938
- Travis v. Rochester Bridge Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1919
- Parish v. Awschu Properties, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- Coca Cola Bottling Works of Evansville, Inc. v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Connelly v. Uniroyal, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Kilian v. Allegheny County DistributorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Dudley Sports Co. v. SchmittIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Forry v. Gulf Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Leszczynski v. SurgesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.