Legal Opinion

Holland Furnace Co. v. Nauracaj

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1938No. 15,685PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaymon, C. J.

— Appellee Sophia Nauracaj instituted this action against appellant and appellee Brecka to recover damages alleged to have resulted from the negligence of appellant in the installation of a furnace on her property, pursuant to a written contract entered into by appellant with appellee Brecka, who was, at the time, a tenant of appellee Nauracaj and in possession of the premises where the furnace was installed. The amended complaint was in one paragraph. Appellant unsuccessfully demurrer to this complaint for insufficient facts and reserved an exception to the ruling of the court. Appellant…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Giraude v. Elec. Improvement Co. of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Clements v. Louisiana Electric Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1892
  3. Hebert v. Lake Charles Ice, Light & Waterworks Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  4. Daugherty v. HerzogIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Griffin v. United Electric Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. J. I. Case Co. v. SandefurIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Greeno v. Clark Equipment CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1965
  4. Peters v. ForsterIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Essex v. RyanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API