Nelson v. Huber & Huber Express Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) By special ground 2 of the amended motion for a new trial it is contended that the trial court erred in charging the jury in substance that, if they found that the plaintiff had breached the contract by his failure to build a fence, then and in that event, the measure of damages would be the cost of building the fence, rather than t-he cost of maintaining a night watchman on the premises.
By its cross-action, the defendant is seeking to recover $4824.88, which it is alleged was the amount paid to a night watchman, made necessary because the plaintiff…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Citizens & Southern National Bank v. KontzSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Barbre v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Pelham Manufacturing Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Overstreet v. W. T. Rawleigh Co. Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Moffett v. McCurryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Spainhour v. NolindCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Atlantic Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Butler v. RevilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.