Legal Opinion

Gill v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1916No. S. F. No. 6826PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEALS from certain orders of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County. A. J. Buckles, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

In the year 1909, the plaintiff began an action against the defendant to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff because of the negligence of the defendant. An amended complaint was filed, to which a demurrer was interposed and the cause was pending awaiting action upon the demurrer. Paul C. Dormitzer was the attorney for the plaintiff and M. R. Jones was the attorney for the defendant. On September 1, 1911, on motion of the plaintiff, the superior, court made an order substituting L. F. Tormey as attorney for the plaintiff instead of said Dormitzer. Notice of this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parsons v. WeisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Gage v. AtwaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Collins v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Preston v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Forslund v. ForslundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Douglas v. JanisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Davis v. RudolphCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Schomer v. R. L. Craig Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API