Legal Opinion
Holman v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 27, 1950No. Civ. 4026PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
Action for damages to property by reason of certain highway improvements.
Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment in this, an action in inverse condemnation proceedings, brought against the state for damages to property by reason of the construction of a dividing strip in the state highway adjoining plaintiffs’ property. A general demurrer to the amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend and judgment for the defendants followed.
The complaint alleges ownership by plaintiffs of property situated on the southwest corner of First Street and United States Highway 99 in Bakersfield. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Reardon v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Iowa State Highway Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- People v. AyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Darnall v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
- Wolf v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- People v. SayigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.