Legal Opinion

Lawrence Kates v. Crocker National Bank

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 19, 1985No. CA 85-6608PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRIS, Circuit Judge:

Lawrence Kates brought suit charging Crocker National Bank with violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.), Unfair Business Practices (Cal.Bus. & Prof.Code § 17200 et seq.), and Invasion of Privacy. These claims were based on Crocker’s conduct in sending notice to Kates that he might be the subject of a future investigative consumer report. No report was ever made, and no investigation was ever commenced. Kates argues that the provisions of the FCRA were enacted to protect consumers, and that Crock-er is guilty of actionable misconduct in that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Chern v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Henry v. ForbesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1976
  4. Neal Golden v. Elwood L. Faust and Dorothy FaustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Gorman v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Renie Guimond v. Trans Union Credit Information CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Jackson v. Bank of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Jackson v. Bank of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API