Legal Opinion

Calamita v. the Tradesmens National Bank

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 1, 1949PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The complaint in this action alleged that the plaintiff, a depositor having a checking account in the defendant bank, issued a check against it, that five days later he gave the bank written instructions not to pay the check and that the bank negligently paid it and has refused to make restitution. The bank, in its answer, admitted the allegations as to the issuance of the check, the written instructions to stop payment and the payment of the check, but denied that it was negligent; as a special defense it alleged that the check was paid through inadvertence, accident or mistake, and, as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tremont Trust Co. v. BurackMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Gaita v. Windsor BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Hodnick v. Fidelity Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Hiroshima v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Carrano v. ShoorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Aiple v. South Side National Bank in St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Mandell v. GavinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  3. Reinhardt v. Passaic-Clifton Nat. BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. Central National Bank of Houston v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. The Commercial Bank v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API